Let it be known, a stone was thrown.

Broken windows theory is a criminological theory that suggests that visible signs of disorder, such as broken windows, graffiti, and litter, can lead to an increase in more serious crimes. The theory asserts that if minor offenses are left unchecked, they can lead to a sense of community disorganization and a breakdown of social norms, which can create an environment that is conducive to criminal activity. The future of broken windows theory is somewhat uncertain. While the theory has been influential in shaping policing strategies in many cities around the world, it has also been the subject of much criticism.

Let's imagine for a second, a stone is flying through the air aimed at a window, the rock hits, the glass shatters, and now whether done intentionally or accidentally another human must deal with the new hole in the architecture. When dealing with this broken window, do they hire someone to replace the window? Do they put tape and a trash bag and temporarily fix it? Do they decide to condemn the building and board up the window? This Kantian dilemma forces choices based on necessity to the broken window given the means and ethical facts available, but one solution never applies or is even accessible to all. There can be a vast distance between one's ‘means’ being their immediate economic situation, and the end being the reality of ‘fixing’ the window and ending the perception of violence. One's economic situation generally determines how the window is fixed but there is always a nuance that must be considered for an accurate and ethical truth to progress. Our various decisions with windows tell a story, whether cosmetic, functional, or quick-fixes. Broken windows embody an example of how humans keep modeling models indefinitely, but eventually must subject such processes to ethical evaluation.